Whitby fishing club whitby sea anglers header image
October 12, 2008, 11:03:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Ken Lands A Tope :

http://www.whitbyseaanglers.co.uk/forum/north-east-coast-fishing/fish-flash/0/
 
  Home   Forum Home   Shop Fame Hall Gallery Tags Login Register  

Polite Notice

This is a sea angling forum for the debate of all angling related topics, including: shore fishing, boat and kayak fishing. Here you will find pictures of anglers going sea fishing and catching fish. You will find angling related debate. Sometimes anglers will retain fish for the table. Whilst we respect the personnal choice of anglers to follow catch and release practices, this is not a conservation forum and devout conservationists unable to accept anglers sensibly retaining fish should seek out alternative forums. Anyone preaching catch and release or criticising other peoples reports will have their posts removed.

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Centuary Wr300 or wr300 or a conoflex anubis+  (Read 968 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Butty
Guest

« on: January 28, 2007, 12:42:50 AM »

my first post on here :-X,im looking to buy a new rough ground rod,and cant decide what to get either a wr300 or a conoflex anubis+,what would you lads recomend.....i have a g5,carbon metal and tip tornado sport.....but looking for a tough rough ground rod........to fish seal goit,round hole,runswick etc

ringer + steerser im jettys dad,who works with deepsea steersers brother
« Last Edit: April 06, 2007, 11:05:39 PM by Baramundi Bob » Logged
Steerser
Guest

« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2007, 12:43:45 AM »

alright ron? pleased to meet ya

the carbon metal and g5 are both more than up to fishing anywhere on this coast.
i hear you're a bit like me and like buying rods ;D
the wr300 and anubis are both top quality rods without doubt mate.
best thing you could do is get through to spotty dog and get a feel of of em both, see what you think, and buy the one that suits you.
if i was you i'd have a week in tenerife and stick with what you've got ;)
Logged
Jem
Bass
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 89



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2007, 06:16:32 PM »

Personally i'd opt for the WR300 for rough rock marks, got plenty of backbone with the needed strength for a good long cast if you fish on the beach with it ;) i have the WR300 and highly rate it, i even went and got the new C Curve as a second lighter clean beach Rod, mind i might be a bit biased as i've always owned century rods  ;D
Logged

pigeonian
Guest

« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2007, 02:00:08 PM »

take a look here couple for sale   http://www.worldseafishing.com/classifieds/showproduct.php?product=278&cat=3
Logged
Dav
The Davonator.......
Spragg
*******

Karma: 21
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2150





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2007, 03:44:43 PM »

i my self have been thinking about another rod as my conoflex nem premiere is needing replacement , i have been looking at the wr 300 me self , or the ttr , but think the ttr may be abit heavy for me as its 14 ft and i,m not exactly arnie and im abit unsure if it would be abit un managable for me due to me being 11.5 stone ringing wet and 5.11 , the conoflex is about at my limit ,has anyone compared a conoflex premiere with the ttr/wr300 ,is the century rod lighter or are they still beasts like the conoflex ? cheers
Logged

Dav

Kayak Fishing News

? Grab this Headline Animator

Tags:
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page October 09, 2008, 06:26:32 PM